The EU’s role in international financial bodies

Who sets the rules governing the financial sector? What interests are represented? If we look at Europe, financial...

Representation of public interest in banking #3 – What blocks public participation in banking?

The activities of Europe’s banks concern all of its citizens: almost everyone has a bank account (World Bank, 2014),...

Brexit and financial services: What is at stake for citizens?

The current EU financial regulation is by no means perfect, and it certainly cannot afford any risk of...

Should we close financial markets?

Financial markets have had two main characteristics since the start of the coronavirus crisis: they have dropped sharply...

Plus de dérégulation de la finance ne soutiendra pas les PME

S’exprimant lors des « Conférences citoyennes » à Epinal le 17 avril dernier, Emmanuel Macron a réitéré sa proposition de...

New trade deals restrain governments on financial regulation

Ten years after the 2008 crisis, we are still not protected from new financial crises. Yet, the CETA...

Bottom-up approaches to corporate governance in the financial sector

Interest of beneficiaries in responsible investment Europeans continue to experience the impact of the financial crisis, including unemployment,...

The power of democracy against the power of finance

All over Europe, youth climate strikers are hitting the streets of cities and pushing to exit our brown,...

Representation of public interest in banking #2 – Who is challenging finance? Examining the diversity of voices in the design of financial regulation

Defining what is the public interest in the regulation of banking and financial markets is difficult, as this...

Monitoring derivatives trading books in the current context of financial markets turmoil

OUR ANALYSES OF THE CORONAVIRUS CRISIS: Managing derivatives positions in a controlled manner requires that a number of...

Basel III finalisation comes undone: A proposal that lets down citizens and backtracks on global agreements

Overview The global regulatory framework agreed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2017 (Basel III),...

Financial regulation: Small victories on revolving doors

In an unprecedented move to avoid conflicts of interest, the European Parliament rejected the nomination of an ex-lobbyist,...

About the decisions taken by European bank regulators and supervisors in the face of the coronavirus crisis

Our analyses of the coronavirus crisis: Bank regulators and supervisors have taken a number of important measures over...

Caritas France joins the fight to re-regulate finance

Regulating finance is a necessity for all The power of financial markets in shaping our societies wouldn’t be...

You enjoyed the last financial crisis? You will love the next one, still more devastating…

Can you think of a motorway with no speed limit, where drinking alcohol is permitted, and even making...

Blocking complexity – how complex regulation blocks public interest representation

Banking regulation in Europe and around the world is dominated by technical and expert rule-making and enforcement. In...

Representation of public interest in banking #4 – The banks, the public and the secluded world of the BCBS: who has access?

Bank lobbying around this month’s meeting of the Basel Committee of Banking Supervision shows how far the pendulum...

The insufficient role of EDIS in restoring trust in banks

Banks are uniquely prone to runs because they borrow short and lend long, creating a maturity mismatch in...

Taking the state – solutions for a besieged democracy

Faced with the rise of populism in Europe, it’s all too convenient for national politicians  to lay the...

Better regulation: Why more stakeholder involvement benefits some more than others

The Better Regulation package proposed by the Commission on 15 May 2015 is a response to President Juncker’s...

A Paradise for the 0.1%

We should not be surprised at the scale of tax evasion revealed by the Paradise Papers.

As the name suggests, the basic dynamic of our economic system relies on capital accumulation, through the pursuit of private profits. The theory goes that this dynamic will work for the greater public good. An extreme form of the (unproven) “trickle-down” dynamic was successfully promoted as a way out of the productivity and growth crisis of the 1970s. Wealth was transferred from public balance sheets to corporations, private investors and financial markets, all controls on capital movements were removed and governments had to enter into tax competition to attract the – now free – capital that creates jobs, production and income tax for them.

In other words, the global elite is not only rigging the international financial system to their advantage: today’s international financial system, including the tax system, has been built to serve their interests. Tax evasion is no longer the occasional failure of an otherwise efficient tax system as it was seen before; it is in reality a global business conducted on a global scale by lawyers and bankers with the highest reputations. This wealth of intelligence should rather be put at the service of society as a whole.

Liberté, INégalité, fraternité

The personal responsibility of tax evasion beneficiaries is over-emphasised. This masks the crucial role of the private financial sector that, not only facilitates tax evasion, but most often has promoted it until recently, when it became globally scrutinized. Most beneficiaries of tax evasion schemes have likely blindly signed off on schemes that their wealth manager or private banker recommended to them. And these bankers, private shareholder-owned, are corporations with the purpose of maximizing their profits. Therefore, wouldn’t they when their own interests are aligned with those of their clients?

And even if the beneficiaries of tax evasion themselves were to blame, this will be for some of them on moral grounds only. Indeed, in most of the cases unveiled by the Paradise Papers, the structure they have put in place to minimize their tax is perfectly legal.

The result is a gross inequality. 80% of all offshore cash is owned by 0.1% of the richest households, with 50% owned by the top 0.01% . The average small businessand the average citizen cannot afford the services of Appleby to hide their money from the tax authorities. They pay a lot of tax; and indeed, more and more tax proportionally – as the countries are deprived from contributions of wealthy individuals and large corporations. The evaded taxes are conservatively estimated at € 120 bn for the EU and $ 500 bn globally . Tax evasion in France is estimated at € 80 bn a year, equal to the yearly deficit of the French State. How many hospitals, schools, roads and homes can you build with that? How many jobs can you create? How many farmers and seaside home owners can you help out of the consequences of climate change?

(Almost) all equal before the law

The constitutional principle of equality before taxation is ridiculed by the institutionalisation of tax evasion. When the largest part of the tax base does not pull its weight, and the bulk of the tax burden rests on the shoulders of those who can’t escape, on the people who work and earn too little to save, the cohesion of republican societies is at risk. This was ultimately made possible because countries became dependent on global capital. Over the past four decades, in advanced economies, States’ controls on capital flows have been progressively released and capital moves freely across borders. States are dealing in isolation with multinational corporations and wealthy individuals that shift revenues and capital where they want to. This makes it impossible for countries to preventively enforce a control policy over tax evasion. On the contrary, this liberalization of capital movements creates competition between countries.

After favouring the removal of capital controls for decades, the OECD has bravely embarked on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting regulations to start to restore the tax base of multinational corporations. This set of various anti tax evasion is gradually implemented by countries and hopefully will prevent corporations to play with different tax regimes. Similarly, the automatic exchange of tax information put in place since the 1st of January 2016 in many countries should help to prevent future abuse from both entities and individuals. Anti-money laundering regulations are also evolving quickly with (i) reinforced Customer Due Diligence in different countries across the world and (ii) tax fraud that has become a primary offence in the EU.

These regulations, together with the Paradise papers, the Panama papers, Luxleaks and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), is a fantastic effort to change things. Our economic and financial system should work for people, not for the 0.1% wealthiest individuals. We want a different financial system, where tax is an equally shared contribution to the building of a fair society, prosperous for all. It is time to #changefinance and tax.

The Finance Watch team


Source: https://www.finance-watch.org/blog/a-paradise-for-the-0-1/

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
guest